Editing Bevel-setting in theory and practice
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
This page supports semantic in-text annotations (e.g. "[[Is specified as::World Heritage Site]]") to build structured and queryable content provided by Semantic MediaWiki. For a comprehensive description on how to use annotations or the #ask parser function, please have a look at the getting started, in-text annotation, or inline queries help pages.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
== Troubleshooting == | == Troubleshooting == | ||
− | Rarely the blade part is perfectly straight, even if the | + | Rarely the blade part is perfectly straight, even if the tools is called “straight razor”. Small deviations in the blade geometry are usually impossible to perceive as such, but they do show up in the width of the bevel sides, and can play tricks while honing. |
[[Image:Warp.jpg|thumb|300px|how warp affects the bevel]] | [[Image:Warp.jpg|thumb|300px|how warp affects the bevel]] | ||