Editing Bevel-setting in theory and practice

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

This page supports semantic in-text annotations (e.g. "[[Is specified as::World Heritage Site]]") to build structured and queryable content provided by Semantic MediaWiki. For a comprehensive description on how to use annotations or the #ask parser function, please have a look at the getting started, in-text annotation, or inline queries help pages.

Latest revision Your text
Line 11: Line 11:
 
This is a frequently found bevel shape on razors. Usually this is the result of frequent stropping on abrasive pastes. As such this is a valid option for getting a keen edge, but once the decision has been made to (re)sharpen with hones, the bevel needs to be brought in its flat state again. It is clear that this can require the removal of a fair amount of steel.
 
This is a frequently found bevel shape on razors. Usually this is the result of frequent stropping on abrasive pastes. As such this is a valid option for getting a keen edge, but once the decision has been made to (re)sharpen with hones, the bevel needs to be brought in its flat state again. It is clear that this can require the removal of a fair amount of steel.
 
A convex bevel is not easy to spot. Visual inspection, whether magnified or not, is not very reliable for detecting convexity. The way light reflects off the bevel panes can reveal something, but it is difficult to be certain. The magic marker test is a better choice of unmasking convex bevels. Another problem with convex bevels, is that the keenness often is still more than adequate to allow the razor to pass the Thumbnail test, which makes it impossible to tell when the last trace of convexity is cleared. The “downstroke”-technique can be used to circumvent this issue. (read below about the ''downstroke'' technique.)
 
A convex bevel is not easy to spot. Visual inspection, whether magnified or not, is not very reliable for detecting convexity. The way light reflects off the bevel panes can reveal something, but it is difficult to be certain. The magic marker test is a better choice of unmasking convex bevels. Another problem with convex bevels, is that the keenness often is still more than adequate to allow the razor to pass the Thumbnail test, which makes it impossible to tell when the last trace of convexity is cleared. The “downstroke”-technique can be used to circumvent this issue. (read below about the ''downstroke'' technique.)
 +
  
 
=== The divergent bevel ===
 
=== The divergent bevel ===
 +
 
There are various reasons why divergent angles may be present at the bevel. Some are fully intended, for instance when a razor was previously honed with a layer of tape attached to the spine. This is a perfectly sound method to prevent hone wear at the spine of a razor. If the divergent angle is known, in other words, if you know how much tape to add, the razor can be honed as such. Otherwise, the bevel needs to be completely reset. This can be done with, or without tape, depending on personal preference on this matter.
 
There are various reasons why divergent angles may be present at the bevel. Some are fully intended, for instance when a razor was previously honed with a layer of tape attached to the spine. This is a perfectly sound method to prevent hone wear at the spine of a razor. If the divergent angle is known, in other words, if you know how much tape to add, the razor can be honed as such. Otherwise, the bevel needs to be completely reset. This can be done with, or without tape, depending on personal preference on this matter.
 
When it is unsure whether the bevel has the desired angle, the magic marker test holds the answer.
 
When it is unsure whether the bevel has the desired angle, the magic marker test holds the answer.
Line 19: Line 21:
  
 
A third diverging angle can sometimes be found on new razors. One method to cut the initial bevel panes, at the factory, uses a spinning abrasive disk. To prevent wear on a new product, the spine is raised above the surface a bit. Needless to say this induces odd bevel angles, that need correction during the first honing of a razor.
 
A third diverging angle can sometimes be found on new razors. One method to cut the initial bevel panes, at the factory, uses a spinning abrasive disk. To prevent wear on a new product, the spine is raised above the surface a bit. Needless to say this induces odd bevel angles, that need correction during the first honing of a razor.
 +
  
 
As with the convex bevel, in all these cases, the sharpness tests may yield false readings, left by the residual keenness from the old edge.
 
As with the convex bevel, in all these cases, the sharpness tests may yield false readings, left by the residual keenness from the old edge.
Line 61: Line 64:
  
 
Apart form the regular X-stroke that comes highly recommended for proficient razor honing, we also can speed up the early stages of bevel formation by adopting the techniques from regular tool and knife honing. Working on one side of the blade with circling, or back and forth motions, can really speed up the process without adverse effects, as long as we make sure the razor stays flat on the hone. As soon as the bevel shows signs of completion on some parts of the blade, regular X-strokes are in order again.
 
Apart form the regular X-stroke that comes highly recommended for proficient razor honing, we also can speed up the early stages of bevel formation by adopting the techniques from regular tool and knife honing. Working on one side of the blade with circling, or back and forth motions, can really speed up the process without adverse effects, as long as we make sure the razor stays flat on the hone. As soon as the bevel shows signs of completion on some parts of the blade, regular X-strokes are in order again.
 +
  
 
== Troubleshooting ==
 
== Troubleshooting ==
Line 85: Line 89:
  
 
[[Strokes for honing a razor]]
 
[[Strokes for honing a razor]]
 +
  
 
--[[User:Bart|Bart]] 00:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Bart|Bart]] 00:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 
[[Category:Honing]]
 
[[Category:Honing]]

Please note that all contributions to Shave Library may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Shave Library:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)