Editing Bevel-setting in theory and practice

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

This page supports semantic in-text annotations (e.g. "[[Is specified as::World Heritage Site]]") to build structured and queryable content provided by Semantic MediaWiki. For a comprehensive description on how to use annotations or the #ask parser function, please have a look at the getting started, in-text annotation, or inline queries help pages.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
 
For sharpening razors with the use of flat hones, establishing a proper bevel shape early in the sharpening process is an absolute condition for success. Failure to meet that requirement is one of the most common honing mistakes, and although it is not very difficult, many straight razor users that wish to sharpen their own razors struggle with this aspect of the process. The main reason for this, is because a cutting bevel can take different incarnations. Sharpness is only limited to how cleanly both side of a blade can meet each other and the angle at which they join. In theory it does not matter if those sides are flat, convex, concave, or even irregular, as long as the apex is one clean line, as thin as possible. But in our real world practice, we use flat abrasive tools, and those tools are only effective with flat bevel sides that lay in the same field as the imaginary field that touches the spine and the edge. In other words: flat bevels in a fixed angle are mandatory for successful sharpening on hones.  
 
For sharpening razors with the use of flat hones, establishing a proper bevel shape early in the sharpening process is an absolute condition for success. Failure to meet that requirement is one of the most common honing mistakes, and although it is not very difficult, many straight razor users that wish to sharpen their own razors struggle with this aspect of the process. The main reason for this, is because a cutting bevel can take different incarnations. Sharpness is only limited to how cleanly both side of a blade can meet each other and the angle at which they join. In theory it does not matter if those sides are flat, convex, concave, or even irregular, as long as the apex is one clean line, as thin as possible. But in our real world practice, we use flat abrasive tools, and those tools are only effective with flat bevel sides that lay in the same field as the imaginary field that touches the spine and the edge. In other words: flat bevels in a fixed angle are mandatory for successful sharpening on hones.  
Shaping the bevel can require a substantial amount of [[On Steel|steel]] removal. It is imperative to achieve this goal with a hone that is up to the task.
+
Shaping the bevel can require a substantial amount of steel removal. It is imperative to achieve this goal with a hone that is up to the task.
 
Let’s look at a drawing that represents the most common possibilities.
 
Let’s look at a drawing that represents the most common possibilities.
  

Please note that all contributions to Shave Library may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Shave Library:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)