Editing Brush Observations
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
This page supports semantic in-text annotations (e.g. "[[Is specified as::World Heritage Site]]") to build structured and queryable content provided by Semantic MediaWiki. For a comprehensive description on how to use annotations or the #ask parser function, please have a look at the getting started, in-text annotation, or inline queries help pages.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | Welcome and let’s take a look at some badger brushes. This article was conceived in a forum discussion, as to which shave brush was better than or as good as, a top of the line badger brush. When I use the term “top of the line”, I mean a brush made by a reputable company, made of select quality material and a brush that gets great reviews by wet shavers who have purchased it. The brush that represents that term, for purposes of this article, is the Heinrich Thater model 4125/2, a 26mm badger knot set in faux ivory. | |
− | |||
− | This article was conceived in a forum discussion, as to which shave brush was better than or as good as, a top of the line badger brush. When I use the term “top of the line”, I mean a brush made by a reputable company, made of select quality material and a brush that gets great reviews by wet shavers who have purchased it. The brush that represents that term, for purposes of this article, is the Heinrich Thater model 4125/2, a 26mm badger knot set in faux ivory. | ||
'''Many shave brushes become popular by reviews that are packed with subjective information.''' | '''Many shave brushes become popular by reviews that are packed with subjective information.''' |